It is currently Sat Jun 19, 2021 9:04 am



Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
The reasons educated/employed women resort to 498A 
Author Message

Joined: Sat May 06, 2006 12:42 pm
Posts: 684
Location: Bangalore/USA/Europe
As it is crystal clear form many success stories, bulk of the 498A cases are fabricated, especially against the educated & well-to-do husbands (esp. NRI men). No doubt when the girl approaches a "professional" lawyer, he/she use their expertise and spin an outlandish story thinking they will be able to intimidate the boy's side. They know it false, but the innocent boy gets so shocked that he may for a moment think that it is huge catastrophe.

Thanks to the advice on this website, men are learning how to deal with this. Then the girl is left, she will probably lose everything she had in some cases. We have to assume that many of these apparently smart girls will not know that they will lose big in the end. Have any of you victims analysed what is the girls' thought process? Just because there is 498A there, they don't need to file a false case that can obviously be defended. So, what us their motivation?
Is it possible that in MOST cases the girl actually realizes that she doesn't love the husband and want to get out of the marriage in such a way that the blame is on the husband? As we know our society is not always kind to a woman without husband. Getting out of the marriage without her being blamed, and if she can also get some money in the process, it is even better. Suppose that the girl had a boyfriend, but didn't have guts to tell that to the parents prior to marriage. So she goes ahead with marriage. After the intial few months of cohabitation with the goorm, she yearns for the old flame. Probably the old lover tells her to get out of the marriage, and if she knows that she can get out as well as get some cash (lumpsum or as often happens, a monthly cheque as maintenance), it is a HUGE temptation. Then she can enjoy life living in sin. My guess is that in many cases the girl's parents are fooled, too.
It will be interesting to hear what the 498A men have eventually learnt about the wife's main reasons, as the evidence unfolds over time. I am sure they get to hear stories from family relatives and friends. WHY DID THE GIRL DO IT? has to be something that many of the victims constantly try to determine.


Tue Jul 15, 2008 1:27 pm
Profile

Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 4:00 am
Posts: 568
Caught my bitch red-handed with her lover. She ran away and concocted a cock and bull story and her parents actually believed it.

They tried to get me agree to their terms, which was

a] Marriage was never consumated
b] I didnt not physically touch her
c] Pay 20 laks as compensation

I told them to kiss my a$$ and got hit with 498a.

Now she is not gonna get divorce for the next 2 years, and I heard her old lover has already lost interest in her.

:)

Dhobhi ka kutta, na ghar ka, na ghat ka.

_________________
Read the Surivival Kit - http://ipc498a.wordpress.com/2007/07/01 ... vival-kit/


Wed Jul 16, 2008 7:12 am
Profile

Joined: Tue Mar 18, 2008 1:44 pm
Posts: 5419
Location: Delhi (India)
The questions can be many, raised in a movie whose title I forgot:

Why did this woman marry this particular man? His looks? His future that seemed secure?
Did she use him for a start in her own life?
And why did she not talk to him if she left dissatisfied?
Both were educated people. Why, instead of trying to communicate and come to an understanding, did she, like an angry and irresponsible child, run away to satisfy her own selfish needs?
Was it for survival or simply an ego tussle or a power play?

I admit, I don't have the answers to all, but most of the times on the face of it, it seems the same alongbwith some irresponsible acts of my OUT-LAWs.


Thu Jul 17, 2008 5:24 am
Profile YIM

Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 12:03 pm
Posts: 28
In some cases girl may have some reason to end marriage.

But 498a shows that girl is greedy.

The most important reason remains MONEY.

I have heard a case where girl married but then her lover came. She ran to her parents & told that she now wants divorce. They better sense prevailed upon girl's parents & marriage was ended amicably. Girl's parents asked for apology and both continued with their lives. These are the really educated parents. NOT MANY ARE LIKE THEM. Most follow the wish o their daughter.

Many so called educated girls have very high desires. When they feel that husband is hurdle so they use this wonderful tool 498a and extract money.

Some girls like to have slave husband.If you do not agree to this kind of girl your end up having 498a.

Some lke independence. No question to be asked by anyone.Ask Question & get reply as 498a.

For 498a girls -LAAKH DUKHON KI EH DAWA HAI [498A] KYOUN NO AJMAINEN.. KAHE GHABRAYE KAHE GHABRAYE....


Wed Sep 03, 2008 9:38 am
Profile YIM

Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2007 5:51 pm
Posts: 280
Location: mumbai
I think we are forgetting something here! There may be other reasons but my bet is GREED.
No decent , self respecting family will support their daughter in a 498 A venture when they know that the allegations are false and story is fabricated. I think it is the lawyers who advice 498 A and they make it sound very easy. Subsequently the Police Officers suggest adding some mirch masala to make the case stronger.

If the 498 A women were given correct advice at the outset no educated female would indulge in such dangerous litigation without very genuine reasons. It is the initial ease with which the assault on the male is launched and support of greedy lawyers and her maternal family that compel these educated women to resort to 498A.


Fri Sep 05, 2008 6:22 pm
Profile

Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2006 8:27 pm
Posts: 194
Mr. Bootwalla Says:-

"If the 498A women were given correct advice at the outset no educated female
would indulge in such dangerous litigation without very genuine reasons".
"No decent , self respecting family will support their daughter in a 498A venture
when they know allegations are false and story is fabricated".

WHICH KIND OF LAWYERS OR BAR COUNCIL IN INDIA WILL ADVICE THIS KIND OF LAWYERS?

Ms. Lavina Chatur Kripalani is an law attorney admitted to practise in Bombay. High Court.
She came to USA on Fiance Visa to marry US Citizen. She was married in USA.
Subsequently she was divorced by order of the Superior Court Middlesex New Jersey USA.
Her father is also practising senior advocate at Bombay High Court. He also participated and
represented along with third senior lawyer in USA Court.


While the divorce proceedings were in progress in USA, she lodged false FIR u/s 498A,with
Nagpada Police StationMumbai, which was registered vide FIR No. 405/2002 dated 31.12.2002.
She did not disclose in the complaint to Police that the divorce proceedings against her were
on-going in USA which she was contesting as competent Jurisdiction.

Nor she informed US Court that, she had lodged criminal complaint in India against the divorce
petitioner and his family.


Fri Sep 05, 2008 8:12 pm
Profile

Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2007 5:51 pm
Posts: 280
Location: mumbai
Sir, Did you verify whether Ms. Lavina Chatur Kripalani hails from decent , self respecting family which supported 498A venture when they knew allegations are false and story is fabricated? NCW chairperson and Minister of Women and child welfare have cried hoarse that cases of misuse of marital and dowry laws are so rare and far between they donot count.


Sat Sep 06, 2008 7:49 am
Profile

Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2006 8:27 pm
Posts: 194
SEX, LIES AND SECTION 498A INDIA PENA CODE.

Sample of false FIR registered by Police U/S Section 498A IPC
and Non-bailable Arrests Made & Prosecution Conducted Without
Any Investigations.

Dear Sirs

Ms. Lavina Chatur Kripalani is an law attorney admitted to practise in Bombay. High Court.
She came to USA on Fiance Visa to marry US Citizen. She was married in USA on 13. 02. 2002
in woodbridge NJ Court and subsequently she was divorced on 01. 04. 2003 by order of the
Superior Court Middlesex New Jersey USA. Her father is also practising senior advocate at
Bombay High Court.

While the divorce proceedings were in progress in USA, she lodged false FIR u/s 498A,with Nagpada Police Station
Mumbai, which was registered vide FIR No. 405/2002 dated 31.12.2002. She did not disclose in the complaint to Police
that the divorce proceedings against her were on-going in USA which she was contesting as competent Jurisdiction.
Nor she informed US Court that, she had lodged criminal complaint in India against the petitioner and his family.
The part of false complaint reads as under:-
As my husband has settled down in America, he wanted to go to America and as
he was working on the post of a director in Information Technology Company in
America, he wanted to remain present there and accordingly he left for America
on 2.12.2001.
At that time I said to him that let me come with you but he said that since he was
holding a green card, if I go to America as his prospective wife, visa can be obtained
quickly.
Therefore I decided to go to America later on. I received a visa for going to America
on 06. 12.2002.

1. The statement is so well-worded and neatly woven that it does not leave any room for doubt that
it is a well deliberated draft by a crook and criminal legal expert. The material facts have been
concealed and suppressed in the complaint to mislead the police.

2. Complainant who is a law-attorney is pretending to be a school girl or the uneducated village woman.

3. At the time of lodging the complaint with the police, complainant was very well aware that she was
engaged to the USA Citizen on 08.07.2001 and as such she had signed and submitted an application
on 12.07.2001 on form G-325 A U.S. Department of Justice for grant of USA Visa. She deliberately
concealed material information in the complaint, to secular arrest of accused fraudulently.

4. At the time of lodging the complain, she was very well aware and she concealed the facts that she had
complied with all the terms and conditions and she had filed all the applications, undertakings and
.Immigration forms on 06.12.2001 under penalty of Perjury for grant of Visa at the US Consulate .

5. At the time of lodging the complaint with the police, she was very well aware that there was the divorce
case against her going on in USA, which was being jointly contested by her along with her father Mr.
Chatur Kripalani senior lawyer Mumbai High Court and other lawyer friend Mr. Mangesh Dhabolkar.
She will-fully concealed and suppressed the material information while lodging the FIR.

6. At the time of lodging the complaint, she was fully aware that,she was fraudulently and will-fully misleading
the police, and the accused were USA citizens and not the Green Card holders as falsely and fraudulently
alleged in the FIR stating that:-
"At that time I said to him that let me come with you but he said that
since he was holding a green card, if I go to America as his prospective
wife, visa can be obtained quickly".

7. At the time of lodging the complaint, she was fully aware that she had returned to India on 28.06.2002 to
pursue her studies in India. The lodging of complaint of cruelty to her by In-laws in USA after over five
months after her return from USA was a motivated act. The false complaint was filed by her on 10.12.2002
as Counter-Blast to the divorce case on-going against her and contested by her in USA.

8. While lodging the complaint, she was aware that she had demanded Rupees Ten Million in divorce case
and when she realised that, she can not stop divorce decree against her and that she was not likely to get
any amount of money or property in settlement in USA, she was resorting to the misuse of the police
machinery in India, with the oblique motives of blackmail and extortion and misusing section 498A I.P.C.
without competent legal and territorial Jurisdiction by making false and fraudulent presentations,
suppressing and concealing the evidence.

9. While lodging the FIR with the Nagpada Police Station, she was fully aware that her friend Mr. Mangesh
Dhabolkar Advocate Mumbai High Court had negotiated the out of court settlement with the lawyer Mr.
Nagananda, representing the petitioner in the divorce matter in USA. She wanted the settlement to be
re- negotiated by her lawyer father for maximum extortion. In this connection she had sent email one month
earlier on 07.11.2002 before lodging the complaint on 10.12.2002 stating that,
" About settling, Mr. Nagananda may contact my father at 851 48 54 or
mobile no. 9821185507after a few days but please tell him to be to very
short and precise in thecommunication because my Dad unlike Mangesh
Dhabolkar will not allow him to talk at length on any irreverent subject
and ask him to call up early i.e. latest by 10 pm."
Her second email on 08.11.2002 states that,
" Ask Naga to get in touch with Mangesh Dhabolkar at 2670317 instead of
my Dad so that they can restart the talks."

10. Before lodging the FIR No.405/2002 Dated 31.03.2002 with the Nagpada Police Station Mumbai
alleging mental and physical cruelty by entire husband's family in USA, she was aware that three months
earlier, she had submitted the sworn affidavit of Written Answers dated 11.09.2002 to the Divorce petition
pending in USA, in which she had categorically stated that :
"The Defendant has no grievance with the husband and very much wants to
continue, preserve and nurture her marriage and return to her husband".

11. At the time of lodging the FIR, she was very well aware that she had sent an email on 20.03.2002, while on five
weeks vacation to California, demanding her own private and personal space to be provided to her in USA to
live like mistress, where her husband could visit her when-ever he wants. Alternatively she desired to quit the
marriage. The email reads as under:-
Dear Dinesh,
I called you today (20th) in the afternoon. I wonder if you got my
msg on the recording for u to call back.
I do like you & want this marriage but I don't know how to deal
effectively with the situation.
The decision we take today may seem 'ok' but that same decision
might haunt you & me for the rest of our lives.
I am requesting you again that whilst you stay jointly with your
family you should be willing to give me my own private space.
Anyway, I am writing this to u because I would be forced to quit
our marriage.
The decision is very much in your hands.
Lavina.

12. She was aware, while lodging the written complaint on 10.12.2002 that she had returned to India
on 28. 06. 2002, at her own free-will to pursue studies at SNDT Women's College for course in
"Event Management" for which she had sent her "Marks-Sheets" ( B.Com, LLB and Shipping )
on 15.02.2002 at fax no. 380 9491 and secured admission in the college. She was surely aware that,
she was not sent back to India against her will in Air-India, flight to India as falsely alleged in the
complaint. She had sent an email after 10 days from reaching India on 10.7.2002 stating:-
Hi Dinesh!
Hows you? I am fine out here.
It feels good to be back in Mumbai. I am happy to be with Mom, Dad,
friends & family.
Today we had gone to the US Club at Colaba to play Housie and
returned at 10 pm.
You could call me at 9 pm my time on Friday. Meanwhile you could
send an email as well.
Take Care
Lavina
(The above email proves that the allegations made in the FIR by her are false,
motivated and Cock & Bull Story lodged more than Five months after return from USA).

13. Complainant has proved herself an accomplished liar.
She has even thrown Goebbels far behind in the art of lying.
The pathological and unscrupulous liar (Lawyer) has resorted to
blatant falsehood and "Legal-Terror" and polluted the Judicial System.
Effective and stern action is needed to be taken against these legal terrorists
to prevent the evil of perjury.

14. If she found the situation so distasteful after her arrival in USA on 09.12.2001, then she being a experienced and
professional lawyer should not have entered into prenuptial agreement on 05.02.2002 and married on 13. 02. 2002
in the Woodbridge NJ Court in USA. She should have quit and not packaged the "distasteful situations" into
bundle of notes for delivery at Nagpada Police Station Mumbai India. She should have returned to India,
as per the conditions laid out in USA fiance Visa.

15. If the complainant had obtained Visa from US consulate as" PROSPECTIVE WIFE" in spite of being
married earlier on 17.11.2001 as alleged in complaint, then she had committed perjury and fraud with
USA department of Justice having embassy in India.
The statement itself can be taken as a voluntary statement , lodged as FIR by the Police and can be
taken as confession of crime and prosecuted accordingly.

16. It is pertinent to note that the police officer, who issued non-bailable arrest warrants against entire
family named in the complaint and posted ' look out circulars' with airport police, did not take any action
against the complainant who had confessed in the complaint that," she had fraudulently secured immigration
visa from US Consulate and had committed forgery and immigration fraud. Police officer did not act on the
information and enquired into the offence reported to him nor he took passport details of the complainant.
The US Consulate was also not informed about the reported visa fraud and confession made by the complainant
at Nagpada Police Station.

17. Divorce was granted by the US court on 01. 04. 2003. No alimony was ordered.
Both father-daughter duo were named, "Blackmailers and Extortionists".

18. There are allegations of mental harassment. Except from the version of the complainant, no material is available to in
the FIR to corroborate what the complainant has stated.The complaint is highly imaginative and exaggerated version.
There is no reference to the dowry articles in the complaint. No particulars have been given. The complaint is full of
character assassination of the husband and his family.Truth has an uncanny habit of surfacing. Somewhere between
the lines of a complaint, oasis of truth can be found. Only material on record is statement of complainant. There is no
averments other than that stated in complaint, against accused. A simple bald statement roping in the entire family is
not sufficient to bring around such a charges. Taking the totality of the material on record and deeming it to be a true
and correct, no offence is made out against the accused.

19. Even charge sheet filed by the police, after one year of registering the FIR, the investigating agency was not able to
procure any other material other than the statement of the complainant. Complaints showing dowry as reason for any
dispute in the family has become common in India, because IPC 498A of Indian Law; is an easy weapon to use by the
criminal, vindictive and abusive Indian wife/ daughter-in-law, with which the husband and his entire parental family
can be harassed, jailed, and subjected to extortion and blackmail to use by the criminal, vindictive and abusive Indian
wife/ daughter-in-law and her parents, with which the husband and his entire parental family can be harassed, jailed,
and subjected to extortion and blackmail

20. Criminal law can not be allowed to be used to settle the personal scores neither the Courts can be allowed to be used as
tools. This law is allowed to be misused by Bombay High Court as tool for black mail and extortion of Rs. Six lakhs only
as settlement between the parties. The Criminal blackmailer and extortionist, who lost her divorce case in USA, lodged
this FIR only to settle her personal scores.There should be perjury criminal proceedings against the false case lodgers
for misuse of public exchequer and already crowded & overloaded judicial machinery free of cost. They must not be
allowed to go Scott free.

Thanking You,
Regards.
Gope Lalwani


Sat Sep 06, 2008 4:14 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 8 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software for PTF.